Police Reports: What Are They, What Do They Stand For, And How to Get Them?
Most people do not understand what goes into a police report, what it stands for in a court of law, and how to go about obtaining one. A police report is a form that is completed by a law enforcement officer after an accident or arrest. In the context of traffic accident cases, the precise name of the report is a “Traffic Collision Report.” In the context of a criminal arrest, the report is called an “Arrest Report.” In the event of a car accident involving a criminal charge of Driving Under the Influence (DUI) of alcohol or a controlled substance, there will be a Traffic Collision Report as well as an Arrest Report. However, people unfamiliar with these documents, or even attorneys who don’t specialize in traffic accident cases, frequently refer to them simply as “police reports.” We’ll use the terms police report and traffic collision report interchangeably in this article.
What a Police Report Stands For In Court
A police report is merely a police officer’s documentation of his or her investigation. Unless the officer was physically present at the scene prior to the incident and actually witnessed what happened firsthand, then the report is at best his or her opinion regarding what happened based on an investigation. As such, the report is considered hearsay evidence and is not admissible in a court of law. The hearsay rule provides that out of court statements or documents (such as a traffic accident report) may not be submitted as evidence in court in order to prove a case. But this doesn’t mean the officer’s work and investigation is rendered completely useless. It still has certain limited uses.
While the report cannot be submitted as evidence to prove or disprove a legal case, the investigating police officer may be called as a witness in court to testify as to his or her investigation. As a witness in court, the officer would be expected to testify in like fashion with what is written in the report. In this respect, the report gives you and your personal injury lawyer a good indication of what the officer would be likely to say in court.
Also, any statements by opposing parties in the police report may be submitted as evidence under one of three notable exceptions to the hearsay rule: an admission by a party opponent; a statement against interest; or a prior inconsistent statement. While the police report is hearsay evidence, and therefore inadmissible in court, any statements that were admissions regarding the legal matter, statements against the interest of the party making them, or prior inconsistent statements (the party’s position taken in court is different that the statement given to the police officer), are admissible in court to prove your personal injury case.
How to Obtain a Police Report
The quickest way to a copy of a Traffic Collision Report or Arrest Report is to hire a personal injury attorney who will handle the task for you. You need an attorney anyway; it is essential if you want the best possible outcome in your legal case. Once you hire an attorney, he or she will obtain the report through the most efficient channels, which depends upon the agency who prepared the report. Some law enforcement agencies make the reports available on the internet through certain legal providers. Some only provide the report over the counter at the agency. Some agencies accept mail requests, which your lawyer can expedite by delivering a stamped mailing envelope to the correct contact person at the agency and paying applicable fees in advance so that the moment the report is ready it will be forwarded to your lawyer.
How Long Does It Take To Get A Police Report?
The length of time it takes to get a police report depends on three factors: (1) the responsible law enforcement agency, (2) the severity of the injuries; and (3) whether that is an ongoing criminal investigation, such as a DUI. The single most important factor is the responsible agency, which is determined by accident location. The California Highway Patrol (CHP), which handles incidents occurring on a freeway or state highway, is usually the quickest. They get the job done within a matter of days, and your lawyer can usually obtain the CHP report in less than one week, sometimes in as little as 3-5 days. Rarely does CHP take longer than 7 days. The San Francisco Police Department (SFPD), which handles incidents on the streets in the City and County of San Francisco, is a little slower. They can take anywhere from 2-4 weeks, or longer. Other agencies, including other police departments such as the San Mateo County Sheriff, have varying processing times but most are closer to that of SFPD, which is 2-4 weeks.
If there are severe injuries, or a death occurred, the investigation will take much longer and the report will often need to be reviewed by upper management within the agency. This can significantly increase the processing time until the report is available to your traffic accident lawyer. If there is an ongoing criminal investigation, CHP will usually prepare its report quickly but the other agencies may take longer than one month to prepare their report. Even if the report is going to take two months to complete, for example because of an ongoing DUI investigation with the SFPD, a competent personal injury lawyer will be able to contact the investigating officer and immediately obtain relevant information, including sometimes digital photographs, needed to take all necessary steps to protect your interests and to build a strong legal case.
WHO is your favorite movie lawyer?
ACTORS love playing lawyers. Movies about the law are as essential to Hollywood history as cowboy westerns, action flicks or romantic comedies. From Sophocles to Shakespeare, Dostoyevsky to Dickens, John Grisham to Scott Turow, novelists and film directors have been enamored of the legal system for its plotlines and morality tales.
Why is the law such an attraction for artists? Most practicing attorneys know that the work itself is often tedious and repetitive—more mechanical than original, more emotionally detached than fully human. The vast majority of cases never make it to trial. The combative spirit of the profession is often expressed in angry phone calls and sniping letters. Decorum leaves little chance of addressing grievances that are emotional in nature but get mistranslated into legal complaints. The bloodless captions of plaintiffs v. defendants mask a lot of the hurt that ends up as garbled legalese.
Movies about the law are not tutorials for budding lawyers but cautionary tales for enlightened citizens—an expression of our collective longing for justice and fair treatment. Most people realize that the legal profession looks more exciting, or functions more diabolically, in a movie; but they aren’t looking to pass the bar exam. They just want to be entertained and elevated.
Here is my list of top 10 movie lawyers, in alphabetical order:
Roger Sherman Baldwin (Matthew McConaughey, Amistad, 1997)
Rudy Baylor (Matt Damon, The Rainmaker, 1997)
Atticus Finch (Gregory Peck, To Kill A Mockingbird, 1962)
Frank Galvin (Paul Newman, The Verdict, 1982)
Vincent Gambini (Joe Pesci, My Cousin Vinnie, 1992)
Col. Tad Lawson (Richard Widmark, Judgment at Nuremburg, 1961)
Mitch McDeere (Tom Cruise, The Firm, 1993)
Jan Schlictman (John Travolta, A Civil Action, 1998)
Alejandro “Sandy” Stern (Raul Julia, Presumed Innocent, 1990)
Major J.F. Thomas (Jack Thompson, Breaker Morant, 1980)
Christopher Shenfield, Attorney at Law, Burlingame, California, June 1, 2016
P.S. To watch the cross-examination of Raymond Horgan (Brian Dennehy) by Alejandro “Sandy” Stern (Raul Julia) in Presumed Innocent, click here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rva_JBOkpOs
Corporation vs. LLC: Which should I choose for my business
♦ May elect a non-calendar fiscal year, providing opportunities for shareholders to accelerate or delay recognition of income (C corporations only).
♦ Is the only limited liability organization that is available to most licensed professionals in California (including dentists and doctors).
♦ May obtain significant tax benefits not available to LLC (S corporation and C corporation have different benefits; see C corporations vs S Corporations for details).
♦ No income tax owed by shareholders of insolvent corporation for “cancellation of debt” (solvent LLC members of insolvent LLCs are generally taxed on the amount of bad debt cancelled).
♦ Creditors of members cannot seize membership interests (and thus take some management control to force extra distributions), but can only attach earnings of the member/debtor as previously authorized by the LLC. [Comparison: Creditors of shareholders, who can attach shares as collateral for security agreements under Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code].
♦ Less annual paperwork (no annual minutes required, and no separate LLC tax return required for a one person LLC).
♦ More freedom to creatively arrange differential capital contributions, profit distributions, loss allocations, preferential payments and voting arrangements between owners.
♦ Fewer limitations and burdens on trust ownership of LLC (dangers exist for trust ownership of S corporation).
♦ Loans personally guaranteed by members are added to basis, so if significant losses are anticipated those increased losses may be claimed as an additional tax deduction.
This comparison is not exhaustive, nor does it apply necessarily in each and every circumstance. The contents of this website are not intended to be, nor shall they be considered, legal advice or legal opinions. Please see your attorney and/or certified public accountant for more thorough coverage of the subject.
This information is not intended to be used nor can it be used for purposes of avoiding tax penalties or promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed above.
Christopher Shenfield, Esq., Burlingame, California, March 20, 2015